SPIB Resource Monitoring Program
In the early 1990’s, new lumber design values were approved for all major softwood lumber species in North America. This testing program was known as the “In-Grade Testing Program” because each piece of lumber tested was required to be precisely of the grade being tested. The design values were based on tests of full-size pieces of lumber, which represented a significant departure from the previous basis for determining design values. For the In-Grade testing program, two grades (No.2 and SS) in three sizes (2×4, 2×8 and 2×10) were tested in three strength modes: bending, tension, and compression. Two new ASTM standards were written to specify the testing procedures (ASTM D4761) and the analysis procedures (ASTM D1990) to determine the new design values. Also included in ASTM D1990 was a paragraph stating that additional testing might be required if there was reason to believe that the resource had changed.

The monitoring program that evaluated stiffness continued annually until 2010 when separate, unrelated tests indicated there might be cause for further exploration. When additional tests were performed to destructively evaluate bending and tension strength of No.2 2×4, it was observed that some strength values were lower than expected. Therefore, in 2011-12, the full In-grade testing program was repeated for southern pine lumber. Because the ASTM standards were already in place to direct this sampling, testing, and analysis, this testing was conducted in a most timely manner. The results indicated that revised design values should be developed for southern pine lumber. These values were adopted in 2013 and have also been included in the 2015 National Design Specification.
SPIB has since altered their monitoring program to include destructive testing. 
The most likely size/grade combination that might see a change in strength values is the No.2 2×4 combination, so that size/grade is tested the most often. Additionally, based on the recommendations of the SPIB Technical Committee and the SPIB Board of Governors, a sample of No.2 2×8 is tested, but somewhat less frequently. The samples are tested for either bending or tension strength. Since the publication of the 2013 design values, the monitoring samples have given a strong confirmation that the published values are appropriate and no changes are required.
SPIB is committed to monitoring the southern pine resource and making sure that the published design values are appropriate. SPIB has been and will continue to be proactive in testing and monitoring the southern pine resource.
